Main Article Content
Research aim: This paper reviews the research literature and publications relevant to audit quality. The authors identify three main perspectives (academic research, professional and regulatory) related to audit quality that could add to our understanding of the concepts and factors affecting audit quality in practice. For each reviewed perspective, the authors present and summarise the key findings.
Design/ Methodology/ Approach: This study reviews a total of 84 empirical studies and publications ranging from year 1980 to year 2016. Further, this paper links academic research to publications on the topic issued by professional practitioners and regulators.
Research findings: Based on the analysis, the review reveals three main findings. First, the review identifies multifaceted concepts of audit quality and the various academic research approaches that have been carried out to assess audit quality. Second, audit quality in practice is not only affected by various internal factors within the accounting firms but is also influenced by various contextual factors in which the accounting firms operate. Third, much of the prior research employs an archival approach that potentially provides limited information about the effect of the contextual setting in actual audit practices, which is important to enhance our understanding of audit quality.
Theoretical contribution/ Originality: It provides some guidance for future academic research related to audit quality.
Practitioner/ Policy implication: The research and reports reviewed in this paper will be useful to researchers, audit practitioners, policymakers and others who are concerned with the quality of audit services to understand the various conceptions of audit quality and the important factors affecting audit quality in practice.
Research limitation/ Implications: The analysis of the audit quality from the three main perspectives provided in this study paves the way for embarking on promising and relevant future research, which is needed to further substantiate and enrich the academic understanding on concepts and factors affecting audit quality. More research is needed to understand this issue better and to move towards a policy resolution.
Keywords: Audit Quality, Auditing, Literature Review, Research Opportunities
Type of manuscript: Literature review
JEL Classification: M41, M42, M48, L84
The Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives (AJAP) articles are published under a licence equivalent to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (CC BY-NC-ND). The licence allows users to copy, distribute, and transmit an article as long as the author is attributed. The article is not used for commercial purposes. The work is not modified or adapted in any way.
Authors are required to sign the Exclusive License to Publish agreement upon publication in the AJAP. The agreement grants the Publisher (Faculty of Business and Accountancy, Universiti Malaya) to publish and disseminate the articles.
Articles published in the AJAP are digital, online, free of charge, and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions.
Article Processing Charge
Articles publish in AJAP is free submission, production and publication charges. However, all accepted articles are required for language editing. The AJAP officially appointed and outsourced proofreader will conduct this process, and the authors will cover the cost. AJAP does not profit from this process and transaction.
Al-Ajmi, J. (2009). Audit firm, corporate governance, and audit quality: Evidence from Bahrain. Advances in Accounting, incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 25, 64-74.
Alderman, C. W., & Deitrick, J. W. (1982). Auditors’ perceptions of time budget pressures and premature sign-offs: A replication and extension. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 1(2), 54-68.
Aldhizer, G. R., Miller, J. R., & Moraglio, J. F. (1995). Common attributes of audit quality. Journal of Accountancy, 179(1), 61-68.
Arnold, V., & Sutton, S. G. (1998). The theory of technology dominance: Understanding the impact of intelligent aids on decision maker’s judgments. Advances in Accounting Behavior Research, 1, 175-194.
Asare, S. K., & Wright, A. M. (2004). The effectiveness of alternative risk assessment and program planning tools in a fraud setting. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(Summer), 325-352.
Ashton, R. H., & Ashton, A. H. (1995). Judgment and decision making research in accounting and auditing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bamber, E. M., & Snowball, D. (1988). An experimental study of the effects of audit structure in uncertain environments. The Accounting Review, 63(3), 490-504.
Beattie, V., & Fearnley, S. (1995). The importance of audit firm characteristics and the drivers of auditor change in uk listed companies. Accounting and Business Research, 25(100), 227-239.
Beattie, V., Fearnley, S., & Hines T. (2011). Factors affecting audit quality in the 2007 UK regulatory environment: perceptions of chief financial officers, audit committee chairs and audit engagement partners. Discussion Paper 2011-13. Retrieved from http//www.gla.ac.uk/
Becker, C. L., Defond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. R. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1-24.
Behn, B. K., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Hermanson, R. H. (1997). The determinants of audit client satisfaction among clients of Big 6 firms. Accounting Horizons, 11(1), 7-24.
Bell, T. B., Causholli, M., & Knechel, W. R. (2015). Audit firm tenure, non-audit services, and internal assessments of audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(3), 461-509.
Bliss, M. A., Gul, F. A., & Majid, A. (2011). Do political connections affect the role of independent audit committees and CEO duality? some evidence from Malaysian audit pricing. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 7(2), 82-98.
Brown, V. L., Gissel, J. L., & Neely, D. G. (2016). Audit quality indicators: Perceptions of junior-level auditors. Managerial Auditing Journal, 31(8/9), 949-980.
Brown-Liburd, H., Issa, H., & Lombardi, D. (2015). Behavioral implications of big data’s impact on audit judgment and decision making and future research directions. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 451-468.
Bryan, D. B., & Reynolds, J. K. (2016). Auditor size and the cost of equity capital over auditor tenure. International Journal of Auditing, 20(3), 278-294.
Cahan, S. F., & Sun, J. (2015). The effect of audit experience on audit fees and audit quality. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 30(1), 78-100.
Caramanis, C., & Lennox, C. (2008). Audit effort and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(1), 116-138.
Carcello, J. V., & Hermanson, R. H. (1995). Temporal changes in bankruptcy-related reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 14(2), 133-143.
Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, R. H., & McGrath, N. T. (1992). Audit quality attributes: The perceptions of audit partners, preparers, and financial statement users. Auditing: A Journal of Practice, 11(1), 1-15.
Chen, C. J. P., Shome, A., & Su, X. (2001). How is audit quality perceived by Big 5 and local auditors in China? A preliminary investigation. International Journal of Auditing, 5(1), 157-175.
Chen, K. Y., Lin, K. L., & Zhou, J. (2005). Audit quality and earnings management for Taiwan IPO firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(1), 86-104.
Chin, C., & Chi, H. (2009). Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(3), 729-765.
Cook, M. (1987). Two years of progress in financial accounting and reporting- February 1985 to January 1987. Journal of Accountancy, 163(6), 96-108.
Curtis, E., (2006). Business Risk Audit: A Study of the Relationship between Audit Methodology, Audit Practice and Audit Standards. University of Manchester, Manchester.
Cushing, B., & Loebbecke, J. K. (1986). Comparison of audit methodologies of large accounting firms. Sarasota: American Accounting Association.
Daniels, B. W., & Booker, Q. (2011). The effects of audit firm rotation on perceived auditor independence and audit quality. Research in Accounting Regulation, 23(1), 78-82.
Davidson, R. A., & Neu, D. (1993). A note on the association between audit firm size and audit quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 9(2), 479-488.
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981a). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(1), 183-199.
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981b). Auditor independence, 'low balling', and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2), 113-127.
DeFond, M. L., & Lennox, C. S. (2011). The effect of SOX on small auditor exits and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52(1), 21-40.
DeFond, M. L., Raghunandan, K., & Subramayam, K. R. (2002). Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from Going Concern Audit Opinions. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 1247-1274.
Deis, D. R., & Giroux, G. A. (1992). Determinants of audit quality in the public sector. The Accounting Review, 67(3), 462-479.
Dowling, C., & Leech, S. A. (2014). A Big 4 firm’s use of information technology to control the audit process: How an audit support system is changing auditor behavior. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(1), 230-252.
Duff, A. (2004). AUDITQUAL: Dimensions of Audit Quality. Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland, Edinburgh.
Duff, A. (2009). Measuring audit quality in an era of change. An empirical investigation of UK audit market stakeholders in 2002 and 2005. Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(5), 400-422.
Dye, R. (1993). Auditing standards, legal liability and auditor wealth. Journal of Political Economy, 101(5), 887-914.
Earley, C. E. (2002). The differential use of information by experienced and novice auditors in the performance of ill-structured audit tasks. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(4), 595-614.
Eining, M. M., Donald, R. J., & James, K. L. (1997). Reliance on decision aids: An examination of auditors’ assessment of management fraud. Auditing-A Journal of Practice and Theory, 16(2), 1-19.
Elitzur, R. and Falk, H. (1996). Planned audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 15(3), 249-269.
Eshleman, J. D., & Guo, P. (2014). Abnormal audit fees and audit quality: The importance of considering managerial incentives in tests of earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 33(1), 117-138.
Feroz, E. H., Park, K., & Pastena, V. S. (1991). The financial and market effects of the SEC’s Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(3),107-142.
Fontaine, R., Khemakhem, H., & Herda, D. N. (2016). Audit committee perspectives on mandatory audit firm rotation: Evidence from Canada. Journal of Management and Governance, 20(3), 485-502.
Francis, J. R. (2011). A Framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 30(2), 125-152.
Frankel, R. M., Johnson, M. F., & Nelson, K. K. (2002). The relation between auditors’ fees for non-audit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 77(4), 71-105.
Financial Reporting Council (FRC) (2007). Promoting Audit Quality. London: Financial Reporting Council.
Financial Reporting Council (FRC) (2008a). The Audit Quality Framework. London: Financial Reporting Council.
Financial Reporting Council (FRC) (2008b). Guidance on Audit Committees. Retrieved from http://www.frc.org.uk/
Ghosh, A., & Moon, D. (2005). Auditor tenure and perceptions of audit quality. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 585-612.
Gonthier-Besacier, N., Hottegindre, G., & Fine-Falcy, S. (2016). Audit quality perception: Beyond the role-perception gap. International Journal of Auditing, 20(2), 186-201.
Gramling, A. A. (1999). External auditors’ reliance on work performed by internal auditors: The influence of fee pressure on this reliance decision. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 18(Supplement), 117-135.
Gul, F. A., Sun, S. Y. J., & Judy S. L. T. (2003). Audit quality, earnings, and the Shanghai stock market reaction. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 18(3), 411-427.
Guy, D. F., Ahmed, M. A. M., & Randal, J. E. (2010). Audit quality attributes, client size and cost of equity capital. Review of Accounting and Finance, 9(4), 363-381.
Herrbach, O. (2001). Audit quality, auditor behaviour and the psychological contract. The European Accounting Review, 10(4), 787-802.
Hoitash, R., Markelevich, A., & Barragato, C. A. (2007). Audit fees and audit quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(8), 761-786.
Humphrey, C. (1997). Current Issues in Auditing. In M. Sherer & S. Turley (Eds.), Debating audit expectations (3rd ed., pp. 3-30). London: Paul Chapman Ltd.
Humphrey, C. (2008). Auditing research: A review across the disciplinary divide. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(2), 17-203.
Humphrey, C., Moizer, P., & Turley, S. (1992). The audit expectations gap-plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 3(2), 137-161.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2014). A framework for audit quality, key elements that create environment for audit quality. Retrieved from https://www.ifac.org/
Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) (2008). Audit regulations and guidance. London: ICAEW.
Icerman, R. C., & Hillison, W. A. (1991). Disposition of audit-detected errors: Some evidence on evaluative materiality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 10(1), 22-34.
Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) (2002). Audit Quality. London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) Auditing and Assurance Faculty.
Johnson, V. E., Khurana, I. K. & Reynolds, J. K. (2002). Audit-firm tenure and the quality of financial reports. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(4), 637-660.
Kang, Y. J., Trotman, A. J., & Trotman, K. T. (2015). The effect of an audit judgment rule on audit committee members’ professional skepticism: The case of accounting estimates. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 46, 59-76.
Kelley, T., & Margheim, L. (1990). The impact of time budget pressure, personality, and leadership variables on dysfunctional auditor behaviour. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 9(2), 21-42.
Kelley, T., Margheim, L. & Pattison, D. (1999). Survey on the differential effects of time deadline pressure versus time budget pressure on auditor behaviour. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 15(4), 117-128.
Kim, J.-B., Chung, R., & Firth, M. (2003). Auditor conservatism, asymmetric monitoring, and earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(2), 323-359.
Kinney, W. R., Palmrose, Z. V., & Scholz, S. (2004). Auditor independence, non-audit services, and restatements: Was the U.S. government right? Journal of Accounting Research, 42(3), 561-588.
Knapp, M.C. (1991). Factors that audit committee members use as surrogates for audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 10(1), 35-52.
Knechel, W. R., Krishnan, G. V., Pevzner, M., Shefchik, L. B., & Velury, U. K. (2013). Audit quality: Insights from the Academic Literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 32(Supplement 1), 385-421.
Krishnan, J., & Schauer, P. C. (2000). The differentiation of quality among auditors: Evidence from the not-for-profit sector. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 19(2), 9-25.
Krishnan, J. & Schauer, P. C. (2001). Differences in quality among audit firms. Journal of Accountancy, 192(1), 85-85.
Lee, B., & Humphrey, C. (2006). More than a numbers game: qualitative research in accounting. Management Decision, 44(2), 180-197.
Lee, B. (2002). Professional socialisation, commercial pressures and junior staff's time-pressured irregular auditing- A contextual interpretation. British Accounting review, 34(4), 315-333.
Lehmann, C. M., & Norman, C. S. (2006). The effects of experience on complex problem representation and judgment in auditing: An experimental investigation. Behavioral Research in Accounting Regulation, 18(1), 65-83.
Libby, R., & Luft, J. (1993). Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(5), 425-450.
Lightner, S. M., Adams, S. J., & Lightner, K. M. (1982). The influence of situational, ethical, and expectancy theory variables on accountants' underreporting behavior. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 2(1), 1-12.
Li, K., & Chen, Y. (2011). The effects of pre-client industry experience on restatement at the audit partner level and audit team level. Working paper, Ming-Chuan University and National Taiwan University.
Lord, A. T. & DeZoort, F. T. (2001). The impact of commitment and moral reasoning on auditors’ responses to social influence pressure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(3), 215-235.
Lowensohn, S., Johnson, L. E., Elder, R. J., & Davies, S. P. (2007). Auditor specialization, perceived audit quality, and audit fees in the local government audit market. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(6), 705-732.
Mala, R., & Chand, P. (2015). Judgment and decision-making research in auditing and accounting: Future research implications of person, task, and environment perspective. Accounting Perspectives, 14(1), 1-50.
Malone, C. F. & Roberts, R. W. (1996). Factors associated with the incidence of reduced audit quality behaviors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 15(2), 49-64.
Manry, D. L., Mock, T. J. and Turner, J. L. (2008). Does increased audit partner tenure reduce audit quality? Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 23(4), 553-572.
Margheim, L., & Pany, K. (1986). Quality control, premature signoff, and underreporting of time: Some empirical findings. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 5(2), 50-63.
Mautz, R. K. & Sharaf, H. A. (1961). The Philosophy of Auditing: American Accounting Association, Sarasota.
McConnell, D. K. & Banks, G.Y. (1998). A common peer review problem. Journal of Accountancy, 185(6), 39-44.
McNair, C. J. (1991). Proper compromise: The management control dilemma in public accounting and its impact on auditor behaviour. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(7), 635-653.
Mills, S. K. & Bettner, M. S. (1992). Ritual and conflict in the audit profession. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 3(2), 185-200.
Morris, M. H. & Nichols, W. D. (1988). Consistency exceptions: materiality judgments and audit firm structure. The Accounting Review, 63(2), 237-254.
Mutchler, J. F. & Williams, D. D. (1990). The relationship between audit technology, client risk profiles, and the going concern opinion decision. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 9(3), 39-54.
Ng, T. B., & Tan, H. T. (2003). Effects of authoritative guidance availability and audit committee effectiveness on auditors’ judgments in an auditor-client negotiation context. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 801-818.
Nelson, M., & Tan, H.T. (2005). Judgment and decision making research in auditing: a task, person, and interpersonal interaction perspective. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 24(Supplement), 41-71.
Nolder, C., & Riley, T. J. (2014). Effects of differences in national culture on auditors’ judgments and decisions: A literature review of cross-cultural auditing studies from a judgment and decision making perspective. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 33(2), 141-164.
Otley, D. T., & Pierce, B. J. (1995). The control problem in public accounting firms: An empirical study of the impact of leadership style. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(5), 405-420.
Otley, D. T., & Pierce, B. J. (1996a). Auditor time budget pressure: consequences and antecedents. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9(1), 31-58.
Otley, D. T., & Pierce, B. J. (1996b). The operation of control systems in large audit firms. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 15(2), 65-84.
Palmrose, Z. V. (1988). An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. The Accounting Review, 63(1), 55-73.
Percy, J. P. (2007). Fifteen years of reformation-what next? Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(2), 226-235.
Peytcheva, M., & Gillett, P. R. (2012). Auditor perceptions of prior involvement and reputation threats as antecedents of quality threatening audit behavior. Managerial Auditing Journal, 27(9), 796-820.
Pierce, B., & Sweeney, B. (2003). Auditor responses to cost controls. The Irish Accounting Review, 10(1), 45-68.
Pierce, B., & Sweeney, B. (2004). Cost-quality conflict in audit firms: An empirical investigation. European Accounting Review, 13(3), 415-441.
Pierce, B., & Sweeney, B. (2005). Management control in audit firms-partners’ perspectives. Management Accounting Research, 16(3), 340-370.
Porter, B. A. (1991). Narrowing the audit expectation-performance gap: A Contemporary approach. Pacific Accounting Review, 3(1), 1-36.
Porter, B. A. (1993). An empirical study of audit expectation-performance gap. Accounting and Business Research, 24(93), 49-68.
Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Rasmussen, B. W., & Jensen, L. (1998). Quality dimensions in external audit services-An external user perspective. The European Accounting Review, 7(1), 65-82.
Ruiz-Barbadillo, E., Gomez-Aguilar, N., Fuentes-Barbera, C. D., & Garcia-Beneu, M.A. (2004). Audit quality and the going-concern decision-making process: Spanish evidence. European Accounting Review, 13(4), 597-620.
Schroeder, M. S., Solomon, I., & Vickrey, D. (1986). Audit quality: The perceptions of audit-committee chairpersons and audit partners. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 5(2), 86-94.
Shockley, R. A. (1982). Perceptions of audit independence: A conceptual model. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 5(2), 126-143.
Sikka, P., Puxty, A., Willmott, H., & Cooper, C. (1998). The impossibility of eliminating the expectation gap: Some theory and evidence. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 9(3), 299-330.
Simnett, R., Carson, E., & Vanstraelen, A. (2016). International archival auditing and assurance research: Trends, methodological issues, and opportunities. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 35(3), 1-32.
Simunic, D. A. (1984). Auditing, consulting, and auditor independence. Journal of Accounting Research, 22(2), 679-702.
Smith, J. L. (2012). Investors’ perceptions of audit quality: Effects of regulatory change. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 31(1), 17-38.
Solomon, I., & Trotman, K. T. (2003). Experimental judgment and decision research in auditing: The first 25 years of AOS. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(4), 395-412.
Stanley, J. D., & Todd DeZoort, F. (2007). Audit firm tenure and financial restatements: An analysis of industry specialization and fee effects. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(2),131-159.
Sucher, P., Moizer, P., & Zarova, M. (1998). Factors affecting the assessment of the quality of a company’s auditors: The case of the Czech Republic. International Journal of Auditing, 2(1), 7-20.
Sundgren, S., & Svanström, T. (2014). Auditor‐in‐charge characteristics and going concern reporting. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(2), 531-550.
Sutton, S. G. (1993). Toward an understanding of the factors affecting the quality of the audit process. Decision Sciences, 24(1), 88-105.
Sweeney, B., & Pierce, B. (2004). Management control in audit firms a qualitative examination. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 17(5), 779-812.
Tie, R. (1999). Concerns over auditing quality complicate the future of accounting. Journal of Accountancy, 188(6),14-15.
Wallace, W.A. (1980). The economic role of the audit in free and regulated markets. New York: Touce Ross and Co.
Watkins, A.L., Hillison, W., & Morecroft, S.E. (2004). Audit quality: A synthesis of theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Accounting Literature, 23(1), 153-193.
Wilcox, K. A., & Smith, C. H. (1977). Role discrepancies and the auditor-client relationship. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2(1), 81-97.
Wilks, T. J., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2004). Decomposition of fraud-risk assessments and auditors’ sensitivity to fraud cues. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(Fall), 719-745.
Willett, C., & Page, M. (1996). A survey of time budget pressure and irregular auditing practices among newly qualified UK chartered accountants. British Accounting Review, 28(2), 101-120.
Wu, M. G. H. (2006). An economic analysis of audit and nonaudit services: The trade-off between competition crossovers and knowledge spillovers. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(2), 527-554.