Main Article Content
Research aim: This study aims to examine the relationship between board independence and the performance of microfinance institutions (MFIs). Early studies on microfinance have made immense contributions, particularly in identifying the factors that influence performance. Studies addressing board independence and its impact on performance remain scarce.
Design/ Methodology/ Approach: This study utilised a panel dataset involving 80 MFIs in Bangladesh for the period of 2005–2018. A panel data regression technique was applied to measure the relationship between MFIs’ performance and board independence based on the 80 cross-sectional MFIs with 13 years of data.
Research findings: Our findings suggest that independent directors and board size facilitate MFIs to become financially sustainable. The findings also indicate that CEO duality enhances institutional sustainability but does not enhance outreach to the poor. While the results of this study partially support the proposition of stewardship theory, the proposition of agency theory is rejected. This indicates that MFIs in Bangladesh are operated by motivated agents with similar interests to the MFIs’ owners.
Theoretical contribution/ Originality: This investigation contributes to the microfinance governance literature by highlighting the argument that board independence reduces conflict between MFIs’ principle and agent. This study also contributes to the global debate concerning CEO duality and MFIs’ double bottom line performance from the perspective of a developing country, such as Bangladesh.
Practitioner/ Policy implication: The practical implication of this research is on governance mechanisms in terms of their effectiveness, which is influenced by MFIs’ competence. Since board members should promote stakeholders’ interests rather than the interests of the organisation, there is a need for sound guiding principles that should form an integral part of the policy for better MFI governance practices.
Limitation/ Implication: The limitation of this study mainly concerns the lack of evidence concerning whether or not every licensed MFI in Bangladesh has non-manageable stakeholders. Similarly, this study fails to capture the insolvency level of customers. Future studies may expand on this approach and create a measure for MFIs’ outreach to the poor.
Keywords: Bangladesh, Board Independence, Governance, Microfinance
Type of article: Research paper
JEL Classification: G21, M41
Articles in the Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives (AJAP) are published under a licence equivalent to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (CC BY-NC-ND). The licence allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article as long as the author is attributed, the article is not used for commercial purposes, and the work is not modified or adapted in any way.
Authors are required to sign the Exclusive License to Publish agreement upon publication in the AJAP. The agreement grants the Publisher (Faculty of Business and Accountancy, Universiti Malaya) the rights to publish and disseminate the articles.
Articles published in the AJAP is available in digital, online, free of charge, and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions.
Article Processing Charge
Articles publish in AJAP is free submission, production and publication charges. However, all accepted articles are required for language editing. The AJAP officially appointed and outsourced proofreader will conduct this process, and the authors will cover the cost. AJAP does not profit from this process and transaction.
Ahmed, S. (2009). Microfinance institutions in Bangladesh: Achievements and challenges. Managerial Finance, 35(12), 999–1010. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350911000052
Akingunola, R. O., Adekunle, O. A., & Adedipe, O. A. (2013). Corporate governance and bank’s performance in Nigeria (Post–bank’s consolidation). European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 2(8), 89-111.
Al Farooque, O., Van Zijl, T., Dunstan, K., & Karim, A. W. (2007). Corporate governance in Bangladesh: Link between ownership and financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1453–1468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00657.x
Anand, S. (2012). Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In Governance, Risk, and Compliance Handbook: Technology, Finance, Environmental, and International Guidance and Best Practices. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118269213.ch67
Balachandran, B., & Faff, R. (2015). Corporate governance, firm value and risk: Past, present, and future. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 35(2015), 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2015.07.002
Balc, L. B., Ilies, R., Cioban, B., & Cuza, B. (2013). Corporate governance: Conceptual approaches. Managerial Challenges of the Contemporary Society, 5, 14–17. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1519306094?accountid=40355
Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Econometric Theory, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466600006150
Bassem, B. S. (2009). Governance and performance of microfinance institutions in Mediterranean countries. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.3846/1611-1699.2009.10.31-43
Bauer, R., Frijns, B., Otten, R., & Tourani-rad, A. (2008). The impact of corporate governance on corporate performance: Evidence from Japan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 16(2008), 236–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2007.05.001
Beisland, L. A., Mersland, R., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2015). Audit Quality and Corporate Governance: Evidence from the Microfinance Industry. International Journal of Auditing, 19(3), 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12041
Biswas, P. K. (2015). Corporate governance reforms in emerging countries: A case study of Bangladesh. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 12(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2013.31
Breitung, J., & Das, S. (2005). Panel unit root tests under cross‐sectional dependence. Statistica Neerlandica, 59(4), 414–433. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2005.00299.x
Brennan, N. M., & Solomon, J. (2008). Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: An overview. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(7), 885–906. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810907401
Chen, S., & Huang, Y. S. (2014). Corporate governance in emerging markets : An introduction. International Review of Economics and Finance, 32(2014), 1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2014.01.003
Cheung, Y., Connelly, J. T., Jiang, P., & Limpaphayom, P. (2011). Does Corporate Governance Predict Future Performance ? Evidence from Hong Kong. Financial Management, 40(1), 159–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01138.x
Christopher, J. (2010). Corporate governance—A multi-theoretical approach to recognizing the wider influencing forces impacting on organizations. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(8), 683–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2010.05.002
Copestake, J., Johnson, S., Cabello, M., Goodwin-Groen, R., Gravesteijn, R., Humberstone, J., Nino-Zarazua, M., & Titus, M. (2016). Towards a plural history of microfinance. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 37(3), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2016.1197102
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. In Research design Qualitative quantitative and mixed methods approaches. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
Cull, R., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Morduch, J. (2009). Microfinance Tradeoffs: Regulation, Competition, and Financing (No. 5086; WPS5086). http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/846571468339264494/Microfinance-tradeoffs-regulation-competition-and-financing
Cull, R., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Morduch, J. (2011). Does Regulatory Supervision Curtail Microfinance Profitability and Outreach? World Development, 39(6), 949–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.016
Cull, R., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Morduch, J. (2014). Banks and Microbanks. Journal of Financial Services Research, 46(1), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-013-0177-z
Das, A., & Ghosh, S. (2004). Corporate Governance in Banking System: An Empirical Investigation. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(12), 1263–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.05.008
Davis, G. F. (2005). New directions in corporate governance. Annual Review of Sociology, 31(1), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122249
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258
Devi, P. S., & Shaikh, M. A. (2017). Risk management practices of select microfinance institutions in Telangana State, India. International Journal of Economics and Management Systems, 2(1), 17–26. http://www.iaras.org/iaras/journals/ijems
Dey, A. (2008). Corporate governance and agency conflicts. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(5), 1143–1181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.l475-679X.2008.00301.x
Di Benedetta, P. Lieberman, I. W., & Ard, L. (2015). Corporate Governance in Microfinance Institutions. In Office of the Publisher, The World Bank. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/22059/Corporate0gove0finance0institutions.pdf?sequence=1
Donaldson, L. (1990). The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory. Academy of Management Review, 15(3), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4308806
Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103
Drees, J. M., & Heugens, P. (2013). Synthesizing and extending resource dependence theory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1666–1698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312471391
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. In Cambridge University Press,. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.263511
Freeman, R. E., & Evan, W. M. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. The Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19(4), 337–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-5720(90)90022-Y
Galema, R., Lensink, R., & Mersland, R. (2012). Governance and Microfinance Institutions. In Research Handbook on International Banking and Governance (pp. 1–24). https://uia.brage.unit.no/uia-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2429825/Governance+and+Microfinance+Institutions+official+version.docx?sequence=2
Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric Analysis. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Gujarati, D. N. (2004). Basic Econometric. In The McGraw−Hill. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186874
Halouani, N., & Boujelbène, Y. (2015). External governance and dual mission in the African MFIs. Strategic Change, 24(3), 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2007
Hartarska, V. (2005). Governance and performance of microfinance institutions in Central and Eastern Europe and the Newly Independent States. World Development, 33(10), 1627–1643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.06.001
Hartarska, V., & Mersland, R. (2012). Which Governance Mechanisms Promote Efficiency in Reaching Poor Clients? Evidence from Rated Microfinance Institutions. European Financial Management, 18(2), 218–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2009.00524.x
Hartarska, V., Shen, X., & Mersland, R. (2013). Scale economies and input price elasticities in microfinance institutions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(1), 118–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.08.00
Hasan, T., Quayes, S., & Khalily, B. (2019). Role of governance on performance of microfinance institutions in Bangladesh. Eurasian Economic Review, 9(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-018-0102-8
Herdhayinta, H. (2014). The Influence of Board Diversity on Financial Performance: An Empirical Study of Asia-Pacific Companies. University of Agder. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9075/f7669d1b8fd3b27c6c66b7fde23c290459aa.pdf
Hideto Dato, M., Hudon, M., & Mersland, R. (2019). Board Governance: Does Ownership Matter? Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 90(4), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12262
Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00657.x
Hossain, S. (2013). Does external stakeholder orientation in corporate governance influence in sustainability and outreach of microfinance institutions? Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(14), 25–34. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Does-External-Stakeholder-Orientation-in-Corporate-Hossain/b0d2b1c231a75cca484f2968723fcf520fc5bde2
Hussain, M. D., Rahman, I. K. A., Hossin, M. S., & Said, J. (2019). Board Leadership Structure and Microfinance Performance for Better Governance Practices in Bangladesh. International Journal of Business and Management Science, 9(2), 299–319. http://www.safaworld.org/ijbms/v9n2.htm
Im, J., & Sun, S. L. (2015). Profits and outreach to the poor: The institutional logics of microfinance institutions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-014-9398-4
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Jones, M. J. (2008). Internal Control, Accountability and Corporate Governance: Medieval and Modern Britain Compared. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(7), 1052–1075. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810907474
Kar, A. K. (2012). Does capital and financing structure have any relevance to the performance of microfinance institutions? International Review of Applied Economics, 26(3), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2011.580267
Kar, A. K. (2013). Mission drift in microfinance: are the concerns really worrying? Recent cross-country results. International Review of Applied Economics, 27(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2012.700701
Khatun, S. (2006). Bangladesh Microfinance Country Profile. In Credit and Development Forum (CDF) (January Issue).
Krause, R., Semadeni, M., & Cannella, A. A. (2014). CEO Duality: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 40(1), 256–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313503013
Kyereboah-Coleman, A., & Osei, K. A. (2008). Outreach and profitability of microfinance institutions: the role of governance. Journal of Economic Studies, 35(3), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443580810887797
Lai, P., & Choi, O. (2014). Corporate Governance and Financial Performance of Bank in Asian Regions and Recommendations. Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(2), 377–406. https://doi.org/10.5296/ajfa.v6i2.6429
Mersland, R., Randøy, T., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2011). The impact of international influence on microbanks’ performance: A global survey. International Business Review, 20(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.07.006
Mersland, R., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2009a). Performance and governance in microfinance institutions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(4), 662–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.11.009
Mersland, R., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2009b). What explains governance structure in non-profit and for-profit microfinance institutions ? Social Science Research Network (SSRN), 32(June), 1–25. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1342427
Mersland, R., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2013). What Drives the Microfinance Lending Rate? In Midwest Finance Association 2013 Annual Meeting Paper (Issue September). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2144618
Mersland, R., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2014). Measuring Microfinance Performance. In Microfinance Institutions (pp. 1–21). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137399663_2
Mia, M. A., & Chandran, V. G. R. (2016). Measuring Financial and Social Outreach Productivity of Microfinance Institutions in Bangladesh. Social Indicators Research, 127(2), 505–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0979-5
Mori, N., & Mersland, R. (2014). Boards in microfinance institutions: How do stakeholders matter? Journal of Management and Governance, 18(1), 285–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-011-9191-4
Nasir, N. M., & Ali, M. M. (2018). Corporate governance and financial distress: Malaysian perspective. Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives, 11(1), 108–128. https://ajap.um.edu.my/article/view/13417
OECD. (2015). G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (pp. 1–60). OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264236882-en
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (2nd ed). Stanford University Press.
Pugliese, A., Minichilli, A., & Zattoni, A. (2014). Integrating agency and resource dependence theory: Firm profitability, industry regulation, and board task performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1189–1200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.003
Quayes, S., & Khalily, M. a B. (2013). Efficiency of Microfinance Institutions in Bangladesh (No. 19; Issue 19). http://socialprotection.gov.bd/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/InM-workingpaper19-1.pdf
Rahman, I. K. A., Hussain, M. D., & Hossin, M. S. (2019). Microfinance governance: A multi-theoretical approach for ascertaining the wider stakeholder influencing forces. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 24(1), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2019.24.s1.14
Rashid, A. (2010). CEO duality and firm performance: Evidence from a developing country. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(1), 161–175. www.virtusinterpress.org
Rashid, A. (2011). Board leadership structure and firm performance: An examination of resource dependence role. Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, 7(1), 1–23. www.virtusinterpress.org
Rashid, A. (2013). CEO duality and agency cost: Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Management and Governance, 17(4), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-012-9213-x
Rashid, A. (2015a). Managerial ownership and agency cost: Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(3), 609–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2570-z
Rashid, A. (2015b). Revisiting agency theory: Evidence of board independence and agency cost from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2211-y
Rashid, A. (2015c). The influence of stakeholder power on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from a relationship-based economy. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(2), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2013-0109
Rashid, A., Zoysa, A. De, Lodh, S., & Rudkin, K. (2010). Board composition and firm performance : Evidence from Bangladesh. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, 4(1), 76–95. http://ro.uow.edu.au/aabfj/vol4/iss1/5
Rashid, A., Zoysa, A. De, & Rudkin, K. (2007). Corporate governance in Bangladesh: An overview. Presented in the 19th Asian-Pacific Conference on International Accounting Issues, 11-13 Nov 2007, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia., 34–39.
Rost, K., Inauen, E., Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. (2010). The corporate governance of Benedictine abbeys: What can stock corporations learn from monasteries? Journal of Management History, 16(1), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511341011008331
Schneider, A., & Scherer, A. G. (2015). Corporate Governance in a Risk Society. Journal of Business Ethics, 126, 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1943-4
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
Siti-Nabiha, A. K., Azhar, Z., Isa, S. M., & Siti-Nazariah, A. Z. (2018a). Measuring social performance: Reconciling the tension between commercial and social logics. International Journal of Social Economics, 45(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-08-2016-0216
Siti-Nabiha, A. K., Azhar, Z., & Ali-Mokhtar, M. A. (2018b). Management control for microfinance: An examination of the belief system of a Malaysian microfinance provider. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 14(1), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamjaf2018.14.1.8
Stein, M. J. (2008). Beyond the boardroom: Governmental perspectives on corporate governance. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(7), 1001–1025. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810907456
Sundaram, A. K., & Inkpen, A. C. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “The corporate objective revisited”: A reply. Organization Science, 15(3), 370–371. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0067
Terjesen, S., Couto, E. B., & Francisco, P. M. (2016). Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity. Journal of Management and Governance, 20(3), 447–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-014-9307-8
Thrikawala, S., Locke, S., & Reddy, K. (2016). Board structure-performance relationship in microfinance institutions (MFIs) in an emerging economy. Corporate Governance, 16(5), 815–830. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-12-2015-0166
Uddin, S., & Choudhury, J. (2008). Rationality, traditionalism and the state of corporate governance mechanisms: Illustrations from a less-developed country. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(7), 1026–1051. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810907465
Umor, S., Zakaria, Z., & Sulaiman, N. A. (2020). Effectiveness of follow-up on performance auditing issues in practice: A governance network perspective. Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives, 13(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.22452/ajap.vol13no1.1
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. In MIT Press Books (Vol. 1). https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/econometric-analysis-cross-section-and-panel-data-second-edition
Zabri, S. M., Ahmad, K., & Wah, K. K. (2016). Corporate governance practices and firm performance: Evidence from top 100 public listed companies in Malaysia. In the 7th International Economics & Business Management Conference, 5th & 6th October 2015, 35(2016), 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00036-8
Zagorchev, A., & Gao, L. (2015). Corporate governance and performance of financial institutions. Journal of Economics and Business, 82, 17–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2015.04.004